BiH - Vulić
08/18/2025
18:40
EAST SARAJEVO, August 18 /SRNA/ - Head of the SNSD Caucus in the BiH House of Representatives Sanja Vulić stated today that the decision of the Appellate Division of the Court of BiH, by which the appeal against the "seizure" of the mandate of the President of Republika Srpska was rejected, is yet another proof that law and justice do not exist in BiH.
"Instead of ruling in line with the Constitution and the laws adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly, they rule based on pamphlets of a foreigner," Vulić told SRNA.
According to her, judges and prosecutors who agreed to become tools in the hands of outsiders ceased to be jurists, and became mere ornaments without dignity, obedient followers without principles, destroyers of the Dayton Agreement, and thus of BiH itself.
She emphasized that their decision is not justice but a political act, aimed exclusively against the Serb people and their legitimate representatives.
"They have seized our President and trampled the will of the people, but they have not, and never will, break the Serb people. We survived the Janissaries, we survived the Nazis, and remember, we will survive Schmidt and his lackeys in the domestic institutions as well!" Vulić stressed.
She also said that they are destroying BiH from within, and that the absolute end of BiH is inevitable.
"You will not intimidate us or frighten us. Our struggle for freedom, dignity, and the right to decide our own destiny will not end," Vulić declared.
The Appellate Division of the unconstitutional Court of BiH earlier today rejected the appeal of the legal team of Republika Srpska President Milorad Dodik against the CEC BiH decision to revoke his mandate.
At its August 6 session, the CEC BiH decided to terminate Dodik's mandate due to non-compliance with the orders of illegitimate Christian Schmidt.
On August 12, Goran Bubić, attorney for President Dodik, filed an appeal to the Court of BiH against the CEC decision on behalf of the legal team, acting as his legal representative.
Bubić stressed that in this case criminal law, and consequently the CEC decision, are being used as instruments of political pressure.